Desmopressin, Misoprostol, nor Carboprost Affect Platelet Aggregability Following Traumatic Brain Injury and Aspirin.

INTRODUCTION: Desmopressin (DDAVP) has been utilized clinically in patients taking aspirin (ASA) to improve drug-induced platelet dysfunction. Misoprostol and carboprost, prostaglandin analogs commonly used for postpartum hemorrhage, may also induce platelet aggregation. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of DDAVP, misoprostol, and carboprost administration on platelet aggregability following traumatic brain injury (TBI) in mice treated with ASA. METHODS: Male C57BL/6 mice were randomized into seven groups (n = 5 each): untouched, ASA only, Saline/TBI, ASA/TBI, ASA/TBI/DDAVP 0.4 µg/kg, ASA/TBI/misoprostol 1 mg/kg, and ASA/TBI/carboprost 100 µg/kg. TBI was induced via a weight drop model 4-h after ASA (50 mg/kg) gavage. Mice were given an intraperitoneal injection of DDAVP, misoprostol, or carboprost 10 minutes after TBI. In vivo testing was completed utilizing tail vein bleed. Mice were sacrificed 30-min posttreatment and blood was collected via cardiac puncture. Whole blood was analyzed via Multiplate impedance aggregometry, rotational thromboelastometry, and TEG6s. RESULTS: Mice receiving misoprostol after ASA/TBI demonstrated decreased tail vein bleeding times compared to ASA only treated mice. However, mice treated with misoprostol following ASA and TBI demonstrated decreased platelet aggregability compared to untouched mice and TBI only mice within the arachidonic acid agonist pathway. By contrast, DDAVP and carboprost did not significantly change platelet aggregability via adenosine diphosphate or arachidonic acid following ASA and TBI. However, DDAVP did decrease the platelet contribution to clot via rotational thromboelastometry. CONCLUSIONS: Reversal of medication-induced platelet inhibition has become increasingly controversial after TBI. Based on these results, DDAVP, misoprostol, nor carboprost consistently improve platelet aggregability following TBI in those also treated with ASA.

Syndecan-1 as the Effect or Effector of the Endothelial Inflammatory Response?

INTRODUCTION: Syndecan-1 is a heparan sulfate proteoglycan found in the glycocalyx of vascular endothelial cells. Serum levels of syndecan-1 have repeatedly been demonstrated to increase following traumatic injury and shock, but it is unclear whether syndecan-1 plays an active role in the inflammatory response or is simply a biomarker of a state of hypoperfusion. The aim of this study was to identify the role of syndecan-1 role in the inflammatory process in the absence of trauma. METHODS: Male mice were randomized into five groups (n = 3). Four groups received increasing concentrations of syndecan-1 (1, 10, 100, and 1000pg/mL per blood volume) and a fifth group was given normal saline as a control via intravenous injection. These concentrations were selected based on previous syndecan-1 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay data acquired following induced hemorrhagic shock in mice resulting in serum levels of 10-6000 pg/mL. Mice from each group were sacrificed at 1-, 4-, and 24-h time points for serum biomarker evaluation. A multiplex enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was performed to analyze proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines including interleukin (IL)-1a, IL-1b, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, IL-17, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, TNF-α, macrophage inflammatory protein-1α, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, and normal T cell expressed and presumably secreted levels. Whole blood was analyzed via rotational thromboelastometry in a separate group of mice dosed with syndecan-1 at 1000 pg/mL and compared to sham mice at 1 h. RESULTS: Tumor necrosis factor-α was significantly elevated in the 1000 pg/mL group compared to sham animals. There were no significant changes in IL-1a, IL-1b, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, monocyte chemoattractant protein--1, macrophage inflammatory protein-1α, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, or normal T cell expressed and presumably secretedat 1, 4, and 24 h for any group when compared to mice receiving saline alone. No significant differences were noted in coagulability between the 1000 pg/mL syndecan-1 group and shams at 1 h CONCLUSIONS: Inflammatory cytokine concentrations did not change with increasing dosage of syndecan-1 within mice at any timepoint, except for an acute change in tumor necrosis factor-α which was transient. Based on our results, syndecan-1 appears to be a biomarker for inflammation rather than an active participant in eliciting an inflammatory response. Further research will focus on the role of syndecan-1 following hemorrhagic shock.